Science
In this quarter, we had a big project which is making an experiment. We are task in a group. My group is Hardy, Corneille, me. The research question of the experiment is how can certain food affect the hart rate and blood pressure. The science lab report is out best sample of work because in this lab report, we put very specific details and evaluation of our experiment. It is proven by our score, because our score almost reach perfect. We put the failure and successful of the experiment and we evaluate how the experiment should be improved. We also put a very specific details in the steps of doing the experiment. We put the amount of value of each food for the experiment so that the we could execute the experiment well. We did well in evaluating our work because we only not mention the success or failure, but we explain very detail. There were some mistakes we did in during the experiment, which was that we didn’t know that we need to do the experiment every day so that the data we took could be very accurate. But we didn’t take this as a failure to our experiment and didn’t write anything to lab report, we instead wrote the data we took at that time and explain clearly in the lab report that it took a while for food to affect the heart rate and blood pressure. Through this mistake, we learn that we need to take the experiment consistently. We do not take this mistake a failure but we wrote in the lab report how we could improve it. This sample if work is related to thinkers because in this lab report, we are judge to think analytically and deeply about the experiment we had. We need to think how can we execute the experiment well.
method_of_science.pages | |
File Size: | 8249 kb |
File Type: | pages |